| Edited by Tihamér Bakó, Antal Bókay, Ferenc Erős
(editor-in-chief), György Péter Hárs, György Hidas, Robert Kramer, Judit
Mészáros, Júlia Vajda.
THALASSA is the journal of the Sándor Ferenczi
Society, Budapest.
|
| CONTENTS AND SUMMARIES OF THE PRESENT ISSUE (2000/2-3)
Anna Valachi: “I saw the past split”. A
magical self-creating rite out of a therapeutic model »»»
Žarko Trebješanin: Hugo Klajn’s critical psychoanalysis »»» Hugo Klajn: Hamlet’s self-consciousness »»» Žarko Trebješanin: The psychopathology of non-everyday life »»»
Zsuzsanna Agárdi Malek: The complexes of Oedipus and Electra. Past and present of the two complexes based on three dramas by Sophocles »»»
Christfried Tögel: Jenő Varga, psychoanalysis, the Councils’ Republic and Stalinism »»» Sándor Ferenczi and Georg Groddeck on marriage (Rudolf Pfitzner) »»» Sándor Ferenczi’s domiciles (Judit Mészáros) »»» Books
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT ISSUE (2000/2–3) In our MAJOR ARTICLES section, two articles
deal with the relationship between Sándor Ferenczi and the Hungarian poet,
Attila József (1905–1937).
In our section, PSYCHOANALYSIS IN SERBIA, edited and translated by VIKTÓRIA RADICS, we publish the following contributions: ŽARKO TREBJEŠANIN: Psychoanalysis in Serbia
ŽARKO TREBJEŠANIN: Hugo Klajn’s critical psychoanalysis
HUGO KLAJN: Hamlet’s self-consciousness
ŽARKO TREBJEŠANIN: The psychopathology of non-everyday
life
In the FORUM section, we publish an exchange of letters between ANDRÉ GREEN and SERGIO BENVENUTO. In the No. 1. 1999 issue of our journal, we published a conversation between Green and Benvenuto under the title “Against Lacanism”. (The text was taken from Journal of European Psychoanalysis, No. 2. Fall 1995–Winter 1996.) In their exchange of letters, André Green criticizes the published text of the conversation and Sergio Benvenuto replies to Green (Nos. 3–4, Spring 1996–Winter 1997). ««« The WORKSHOP section contains two articles. In her article, Sexual curiosity, trauma and the confusions of tongues. The relevance of Sándor Ferenczi’s work today, KATHLEEN KELLEY-LAINÉ discusses Ferenczi’s article on the “Confusion of Tongues” in light of clinical practice, and presents the case of a young patient as an illustration of this confusion in a contemporary context. In particular, she argues that traumatic effects of adult sexuality on the “innocent” child seeking tender love is not necessarily due to physical abuse alone. Taking into consideration the existence of the unconscious drives of the young child – manifested by sexual curiosity – and the need to find a safe outlet for these, the child may become just as overwhelmed by adult sexuality through witnessing the primal scene or its equivalent – passionate quarreling or fighting between the parents – as through physical abuse. The author’s hypothesis derives from clinical experience, especially with young women in their early twenties. Although apparently successful in important ways – appearance, intelligence, professional life, etc. – these young women remain unusually obsessed with their parents’ live, especially their sexuality, thus jeopardizing their own experiences and sexuality. ««« ZSUZSANNA AGÁRDI MALEK’s essay, The complexes of Oedipus and Electra. Past and present of the two complexes based on three dramas by Sophocles, attempts a mythological and historical disclosure of the Oedipus complex by analyzing three dramas of Sophocles (Oedipus Rex; Oedipus at Colonus; Electra). She also offers a literary-psychological interpretation of the three works. Using J. J. Bachofen’s conception of matriarchy, the first part of her study shows that the two basic complexes of humankind, Oedipus and Electra complexes, are not only the manifestation of unconscious fantasies and desires related to parents, but also the historical, social and cultural memory traces of humankind’s prehistorical course of development. Myths and their classical artistic elaboration faithfully preserve the matriarchal culture. At the same time, they already represent the laws of patriarchal culture sanctioned by the succeeding system of patriarchy. Bloody tragic events are manifestation of the great conflicts associated with the transition from matriarchy to patriarchy. The second part of the study interprets some of the typical motifs, symbolic characters and episodes of the dramas. It compares the dramatic logic of Oedipus Rex with the psychoanalytical disclosing work and reconstructs the “psychobiography” of Oedipus and Electra stripped of mythological elements. The author observes that psychoanalytical theory still fails to identify the right term for the basic conflict characteristic of women, wrongly called “female Oedipus complex.” ««« In the ARCHIVES section three contributions follow: ADAM BŽOCH’s essay, Karol Terebessy and the reception of psychoanalysis in Slovakia, explores the intellectual impact of Freudian ideas on Slovakia. Slovakia encountered psychoanalysis in the first half of the 1940s. It was an outcome of three different productive sources: the young psychology, the programs of a movement called “Association for Scientific Synthesis”, and the Slovakian artistic avant-garde, who produced a delayed surrealism called “over-realism” in Slovakia. The author presents the life and work of a Slovak writer and literary critic, Karol Terebessy (1910–1985), one of the first critics who applied psychoanalytical principles to the interpretation of literary works. ««« CHRISTFRIED TÖGEL in his article Jenő Varga, psychoanalysis, the Councils’ Republic and Stalinism, explores – on the basis of archival sources, memoirs and interviews – the strange career of the economist Jenő (Yevgenij) Varga (1879–1964), an early Hungarian sympathizer of psychoanalysis. Varga become a member of the Hungarian Psychoanalytic Association in 1918, and, in 1919, was appointed People’s Commissar for Finances during the Hungarian Councils’ Republic, the first Communist regime in the country – After the failure of the Commune, he emigrated to Soviet Russia. In the 1920s, he worked at the Soviet commercial mission in Berlin, and maintained contact with Freud until the late 1920s. Later, he became one of the leading economists of the Soviet Union, an expert on the political economy of capitalism. Though he never publicly opposed Stalinism, an ambivalent attitude toward the totalitarian regime can be reconstructed from his memoirs as well as from interviews with family members and friends. ««« RUDOLF PFITZNER presents a curious exchange between Sándor Ferenczi and Georg Groddeck on marriage published in 1921 in Die Arche, a German journal. Pfitzner comments that these two, historically interesting, brief articles show that both psychoanalysts were heavily influenced by the stereotypical views of their age on women and feminine sexuality. ««« In her communication, Sándor Ferenczi’s domiciles, JUDIT MÉSZÁROS presents a list of Fernczi’s known home addresses in Budapest from the beginning of his carrier until his death. ««« *** We accept contributions in Hungarian, English, German or French. Authors are requested to provide their papers with an English and/or Hungarian summary. Original articles, reviews, reflections, and suggestions should be sent to Dr. Ferenc Erős, Institute for Psychological Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Victor Hugo u. 18-22, H-1132 Budapest. Phone/fax: (36-1) 239-6043. E-mail address: thalassa@c3.hu and feros@mtapi.hu
http://www.mtapi.hu/thalassa and http://www.c3.hu/scripta/thalassa The present issue of THALASSA was supported by the Ministry of National Cultural Heritage, the National Cultural Fund of the Republic of Hungary, the Hungarian Soros Foundation, and the University of Pécs. Thalassa is edited in cooperation with the “Theoretical psychoanalysis” PhD program of the Doctoral School in Psychology of the University of Pécs, and of the Institute for Psychological Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest. |